#Emby quicksync hyperv full
At full load, with the "right" motherboard it can consume more than twice as much energy as the i5. The i9-13900k will for sure draw a lot more power than the 13500!! At idle (PL1), the i9 consumes twice the power of the i5. I really can't tell any difference with or without subs. I run Hyper-V (virtualization) and a lot of other stuff and this machine can easily transcode 5 4k HDR to 1080 SDR. I have a i5-12500 (cheapest processor with the fastest (i770) igpu) and 32GB RAM. Using the latest beta and all the new upcoming features of OCR and text modification, even 5 to 6 Gb of VRAM is needed on nvidia to transcode a media with subtitles.īut would be the situation on Intel side for such scenarios and your recommendations ? I've read that idle power consumption does not significantly change for 13th gen for any model you choose but my question here is more about how much ram is needed for Quicksync to transcode one 4K media with PGSSUB ? Using nvidia solution, VRAM is the limiting factor and I easily consume 1,5Gb per transcode. I9-13900k with 64 Go of RAM (2x 32Go) (because it's the only 'K' version I'm able to get at this moment, would have rather chosen 13600 or 13700 instead.) I5-13500 with 32 Go of RAM (2x 16Go) (currently my preference of choice) At this moment, I have two configurations ready: I'd say performance is so-so on an i3-8100.
This is a conversion, I don't know if streaming to HEVC is even an option.
For starters make sure the encoders are detected and enabled.Īnd if HEVC HDR then make sure the hardware tone mapping is enabled.
0 kommentar(er)
